Categories
HEALTHY-FOOD NATURAL SPORT

Validation: Defusing intense emotions

Gold and silver padlock and a gold key to unlock it; concept is the communication skill of validation

Brittany Jordan-Arthur was at loggerheads with her 7-year-old daughter one recent morning. The little girl simply did not want to head out the door to summer camp, finding any and all excuses to hang back.

But instead of expressing exasperation or annoyance — knowing that would make her daughter dig in her heels even more — Jordan-Arthur, a psychologist at Harvard-affiliated McLean Hospital, decided to use a valuable communication technique: validation. Like many skills, the more you practice validation, the easier it becomes to apply when it’s most needed. Here’s what to know and do.

What is validation?

An approach that can help people feel heard and understood, validation is especially useful when navigating emotionally charged situations. Validating someone shows you understand their feelings and point of view, even when you disagree. It establishes trust, helping the other person feel supported and open to discussing solutions.

And that’s precisely what happened in Jordan-Arthur’s stalemate with her daughter.

“I just sat with her and said, ‘You really don’t want to go.’ It was a great example of saying, ‘I hear you,’ and ultimately I didn’t tell her she had to go or why — she came to that conclusion herself,” Jordan-Arthur says. “We walked out the door without all the need for explanations.”

Many try validation but don’t succeed

Validation is fundamental to a type of talk therapy called dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), which is geared toward people who experience emotions very intensely. Many people use some aspects of validation in everyday communications with family members, friends, and colleagues, but usually fall short, Jordan-Arthur says. How?

“They jump into problem-solving, saying something validating, but then immediately tell the person what they should have done or what they should do next,” she says. “They don’t let that validation sink in. It’s like putting on anti-itch cream and then immediately washing it off.”

How can you offer validation?

Jordan-Arthur shares these pointers for validating another person:

  • Give them your full attention.
  • Make eye contact and nod appropriately, saying “uh huh” while showing your interest.
  • Reflect what you’ve heard by restating their message, such as, “It sounds like you feel worse about this situation today than yesterday.”
  • Verbalize the unspoken, such as, “I hear that you feel you can’t get anything done because of this obstacle,” or “It sounds like you’re frustrated.”
  • Give it time to work! Be sure to let the validation sink in before attempting to problem- solve.

Does validation condone troubling behavior?

Validation isn’t the same as condoning someone’s bad or frustrating behavior, Jordan-Arthur notes. It’s not akin to reassuring them when reassurance isn’t appropriate.

“You may be afraid you’re going to communicate that you approve of their behavior or agree with their actions or choices,” she says. “But if you slow down and validate how someone feels in the moment, before a poor decision is made, validating accomplishes exactly the opposite.”

Try this phrasing instead:

  • “I hear that this is important to you.”
  • “I can see how this has been so upsetting/difficult/scary for you.”

How can you validate teens?

Validating teenagers isn’t dissimilar from the tactics Jordan-Arthur used with her 7-year-old — the problems just tend to be bigger. For example, teens often feel stuck with teachers they don’t like or complain that teachers seem overly harsh.

“Parents have lots of urges to say, ‘Oh, the teacher isn’t that bad’ or ‘I’m sure they mean well,’ defending the teacher and his or her perspective,” Jordan-Arthur says. “The odds are, by the time a kid is a teen, they also have that skill, but it’s going to take them a moment to get there.”

Here’s what to say instead:

  • “I hear that you don’t feel respected.”
  • “It’s so hard to feel helpless.”
  • “It’s difficult to feel your teacher has control over how well you do in class.”

“You can validate their feelings even if you feel the teacher is being respectful,” Jordan-Arthur adds.

How can you validate adults?

Validating other adults in your professional or personal life involves much the same approach. With a colleague who’s feeling undervalued at the office, for instance, try saying, “It makes total sense that you’re feeling really frustrated. I know how important your work is to you.”

If you’re arguing with a spouse or partner, you can believe them as being genuine, Jordan-Arthur says, despite a difference of opinion. Try saying, “I can tell that this issue feels really important to you and you want me to pay attention to what you’re saying.”

It’s also wise to pay attention to the other person’s body language during heated moments. After validating them — but before offering a potential solution to a problem — look for clues that they’re calming down, such as breathing and gesturing more slowly.

“I encourage people to count to 10 in their heads, because we still tend to jump the gun and not wait for the other person to feel that validation,” she says. “If we do that, they’ll often move past the idea that ‘this person wronged me’ and start solving the problem on their own.”

About the Author

photo of Maureen Salamon

Maureen Salamon, Executive Editor, Harvard Women's Health Watch

Maureen Salamon is executive editor of Harvard Women’s Health Watch. She began her career as a newspaper reporter and later covered health and medicine for a wide variety of websites, magazines, and hospitals. Her work has … See Full Bio View all posts by Maureen Salamon

About the Reviewer

photo of Howard E. LeWine, MD

Howard E. LeWine, MD, Chief Medical Editor, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Howard LeWine is a practicing internist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Chief Medical Editor at Harvard Health Publishing, and editor in chief of Harvard Men’s Health Watch. See Full Bio View all posts by Howard E. LeWine, MD

Categories
HEALTHY-FOOD NATURAL SPORT

The FDA relaxes restrictions on blood donation

Cartoonish graphic with four pairs of hands holding blood donation bags; tubing marked with blood type leads to red heart in center

While the FDA rules for blood donation were revised twice in the last decade, one group — men who have sex with men (MSM) — continued to be turned away from donating. Now new, evidence-based FDA rules embraced by the American Red Cross will focus on individual risk rather than groupwide restrictions.

Medical experts consider the new rules safe based on extensive evidence. Let’s review the changes here.

The new blood donation rules: One set of questions

The May 2023 FDA guidelines recommend asking every potential blood donor the same screening questions. These questions ask about behavior that raises risk for HIV, which can be spread through a transfusion.

Blood donation is then allowed, or not, based on personal risk factors for HIV and other blood-borne diseases.

Questions for potential blood donors

Screening questions focus on the risk of recent HIV infection, which is more likely to be missed by routine testing than a longstanding infection.

The screening questions ask everyone — regardless of gender, sex, or sexual orientation — whether in the past three months they have

  • had a new sexual partner and engaged in anal sex
  • had more than one sexual partner and engaged in anal sex
  • taken medicines to prevent HIV infection (such as pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP)
  • exchanged sex for pay or drugs, or used nonprescription injection drugs
  • had sex with someone who has previously tested positive for HIV infection
  • had sex with someone who exchanged sex for pay or drugs
  • had sex with someone who used nonprescription injection drugs.

When is a waiting period recommended before giving blood?

  • Answering no to all of these screening questions suggests a person has a low risk of having a recently acquired HIV infection. No waiting period is necessary.
  • Answering yes to any of these screening questions raises concern that a potential donor might have an HIV infection. A three-month delay before giving blood is advised.

Does a waiting period before giving blood apply in other situations?

Yes:

  • A three-month delay before giving blood is recommended after a blood transfusion; treatment for gonorrhea or syphilis; or after most body piercings or tattoos not done with single-use equipment. These are not new rules.
  • A waiting period before giving blood is recommended for people who take medicines to prevent HIV infection, called PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis). PrEP might cause a test for HIV to be negative even if infection is present. The new guidelines recommend delaying blood donation until three months after the last use of PrEP pills, or a two-year delay after a person receives long-acting, injected PrEP.

Who cannot donate blood?

Anyone who has had a confirmed positive test for HIV infection or has taken medicines to treat HIV infection is permanently banned from donating blood. This rule is not new.

Why were previous rules more restrictive?

In 1983, soon after the HIV epidemic began in the US, researchers recognized that blood transfusions could spread the infection from blood donor to recipient. US guidelines banned men who had sex with men from giving blood. A lifetime prohibition was intended to limit the spread of HIV.

At that time, HIV and AIDS were more common in certain groups, not only among MSM, but also among people from Haiti and sub-Saharan Africa, and people with hemophilia. This led to blood donation bans for some of these people, as well.

A lot has changed in the world of HIV in the last several decades, especially the development of highly accurate testing and highly effective prevention and treatment. Still, the rules regarding blood donation were slow to change.

The ban from the 1980s for MSM remained in place until 2015. At that time, rules were changed to allow MSM to donate only if they attested to having had no sex with a man for 12 months. In 2020, the period of sexual abstinence was reduced, this time to three months.

Why are the blood donation guideline changes important?

  • Removing unnecessary restrictions that apply only to certain groups is a step forward in reducing discrimination and stigma for people who wish to donate blood but were turned away in the past.
  • The critical shortage in our blood supply has worsened since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. These revised rules are expected to significantly boost the number of blood donors.

The bottom line

Science and hard evidence should drive policy regarding blood donation as much as possible. Guidelines should not unnecessarily burden any particular group. These new guidelines represent progress in that regard.

Of course, these changes will be closely monitored to make sure the blood supply remains safe. My guess is that they’ll endure. And it wouldn’t surprise me if there is additional lifting of restrictions in the future.

About the Author

photo of Robert H. Shmerling, MD

Robert H. Shmerling, MD, Senior Faculty Editor, Harvard Health Publishing; Editorial Advisory Board Member, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Robert H. Shmerling is the former clinical chief of the division of rheumatology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), and is a current member of the corresponding faculty in medicine at Harvard Medical School. … See Full Bio View all posts by Robert H. Shmerling, MD